Collaborative LaTeX editor built for manual workflows

Overleaf vs. TypeTeX

Overleaf is the most widely adopted LaTeX editor for academic teams who are comfortable managing formatting, references, and version control by hand.

Best for: Researchers and lecturers entrenched in LaTeX-first tooling.

Explore features

Quick takeaways

Where Overleaf fits today—and why teams graduate to TypeTeX when publications demand more structure, compliance, or AI assistance.

Strengths

Large gallery of LaTeX templates maintained by the community.
Generous free tier for open-source and education users.
Real-time co-authoring with live previews for LaTeX documents.

Where it falls short

No source-grounded AI to accelerate drafting or peer review.
Limited PDF export options and no native Word handoff.
Citation management relies on external tools and manual syncing.

Why teams pick TypeTeX

A research platform built for accuracy, speed, and compliance

These capabilities consistently help teams transition from Overleaf without losing momentum.

TypeTeX advantage

AI assistant that cites uploaded sources and respects journal structure.

TypeTeX advantage

Hybrid PDF, Word, and LaTeX exports with formatting guardrails.

TypeTeX advantage

Unified reference library and compliance checks baked into the editor.

Feature-by-feature comparison

A condensed snapshot of how workflows differ. Dive into the links below for migration guides and best practices.

Capability	TypeTeX	Overleaf
Drafting	AI-assisted writing grounded in your sources with inline acceptance controls.	Manual writing—no AI support beyond basic autocomplete.
Citations	Centralized library with auto-generated bibliographies and style checks.	BibTeX uploads only; relies on third-party managers for upkeep.
Formatting	Submission checklists for IEEE, Nature, arXiv, and more.	Template-based but formatting compliance is manual.
Exports	One-click PDF, DOCX, and LaTeX.	Primarily LaTeX → PDF.

Resources

Recommended next steps

Deepen your evaluation with migration guides, feature walkthroughs, and long-form comparisons.

Overleaf vs. TypeTeX comparison

Deep dive into workflows, pricing, and collaboration trade-offs.

Why AI-grounded drafting matters

Learn how TypeTeX keeps generated content tied to your uploaded sources.

See it live

Book a walkthrough tailored to your current Overleaf workflow. We'll cover migration, training, and stakeholder rollout.

Talk to our team

Explore more

Comparing other platforms?

Continue your evaluation with breakdowns of the tools your collaborators already rely on.

Crixet

Crixet is a newer browser-based LaTeX editor offering real-time collaboration and basic AI features. It targets users seeking a free Overleaf alternative but lacks source-grounded AI and Typst support.

View comparison

ShareLaTeX

ShareLaTeX lives on inside Overleaf’s infrastructure, focusing on solo LaTeX authors who prefer a classic editing experience without modern collaboration or AI tooling.

View comparison

Authorea

Authorea targets researchers who need publisher-ready templates and embedded data visualizations, but it lacks AI drafting and advanced citation automation.

View comparison

Notion

Notion is a versatile workspace for notes and project management. It lacks academic formatting, structured references, and export fidelity for manuscripts.

View comparison

Google Docs

Google Docs accelerates casual collaboration but struggles with citations, structured formatting, and enterprise research compliance.

View comparison

Back to competitors overview