Free LaTeX editor with basic AI assistance

Crixet vs. TypeTeX

Crixet is a newer browser-based LaTeX editor offering real-time collaboration and basic AI features. It targets users seeking a free Overleaf alternative but lacks source-grounded AI and Typst support.

Best for: Budget-conscious researchers wanting affordable LaTeX editing ($7/mo Pro).

Explore features
Quick takeaways
Where Crixet fits today—and why teams graduate to TypeTeX when publications demand more structure, compliance, or AI assistance.

Strengths

  • Free tier with unlimited projects and basic AI assistance.
  • Clean, uncluttered interface focused on equations.
  • Zotero integration for citation management.
  • Voice-to-code and image-to-LaTeX features.

Where it falls short

  • AI cannot autonomously edit—suggestions only with 40% success rate on errors.
  • No multi-file awareness—AI treats each file independently.
  • Slower compilation (8+ seconds vs sub-second alternatives).
  • Limited template library compared to Overleaf.
  • No Typst support—LaTeX only.
Why teams pick TypeTeX

A research platform built for accuracy, speed, and compliance

These capabilities consistently help teams transition from Crixet without losing momentum.

TypeTeX advantage
Source-grounded AI that understands your entire project context.
TypeTeX advantage
Sub-second compilation with Typst (vs 8+ seconds on Crixet).
TypeTeX advantage
Modern Typst support alongside LaTeX for faster workflows.
TypeTeX advantage
Higher AI accuracy with autonomous editing capabilities.
Feature-by-feature comparison
A condensed snapshot of how workflows differ. Dive into the links below for migration guides and best practices.
CapabilityTypeTeXCrixet
AI CapabilitiesSource-grounded AI with autonomous editing and high accuracy.Basic AI suggestions only—40% error-fixing success rate.
Compilation SpeedSub-second with Typst; instant feedback loop.8+ seconds average—slower iteration cycles.
Language SupportBoth Typst and LaTeX with seamless switching.LaTeX only—no Typst support.
Project ContextAI understands full project, citations, and sources.No multi-file awareness—each file treated independently.
Resources

Recommended next steps

Deepen your evaluation with migration guides, feature walkthroughs, and long-form comparisons.

Crixet vs. TypeTeX comparison

Detailed comparison of AI features, speed, and capabilities.

Why Typst matters

Learn how Typst delivers instant compilation without timeouts.

See it live
Book a walkthrough tailored to your current Crixet workflow. We'll cover migration, training, and stakeholder rollout.
Talk to our team
Explore more

Comparing other platforms?

Continue your evaluation with breakdowns of the tools your collaborators already rely on.

Overleaf

Overleaf is the most widely adopted LaTeX editor for academic teams who are comfortable managing formatting, references, and version control by hand.

View comparison

ShareLaTeX

ShareLaTeX lives on inside Overleaf’s infrastructure, focusing on solo LaTeX authors who prefer a classic editing experience without modern collaboration or AI tooling.

View comparison

Authorea

Authorea targets researchers who need publisher-ready templates and embedded data visualizations, but it lacks AI drafting and advanced citation automation.

View comparison

Notion

Notion is a versatile workspace for notes and project management. It lacks academic formatting, structured references, and export fidelity for manuscripts.

View comparison

Google Docs

Google Docs accelerates casual collaboration but struggles with citations, structured formatting, and enterprise research compliance.

View comparison
Back to competitors overview
Crixet vs. TypeTeX | TypeTeX